Loading...
Projects / Programmes source: ARIS

Privatizacija in evalvacija družbenih dejavnosti (Slovene)

Periods
Research activity

Code Science Field Subfield
5.04.00  Social sciences  Administrative and organisational sciences   

Code Science Field
S170  Social sciences  Political and administrative sciences 
S189  Social sciences  Organizational science 
S213  Social sciences  Social structures 
Evaluation (rules)
source: COBISS
Researchers (5)
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  08848  PhD Hajdeja Iglič  Sociology  Researcher  2001 - 2003  141 
2.  06354  PhD Sonja Kump  Educational studies  Researcher  2001 - 2003  419 
3.  14641  PhD Mirna Macur  Sociology  Researcher  2001 - 2002  224 
4.  01103  PhD Andrej Rus  Sociology  Researcher  2001 - 2003  200 
5.  15320  PhD Boštjan Zalar  Sociology  Head  2001 - 2003  274 
Organisations (1)
no. Code Research organisation City Registration number No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  0582  University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences  Ljubljana  1626957  40,399 
Abstract
The programme is an amalgam of the following two projects: the Privatisation of Social Services and Evaluation of Higher Education. The common feature of both projects is modernisation of public services and/or the public sector. The privatisation deals with overhauling of the system, and the evaluation with an evaluation of policies and programmes. The privatisation is examined from the aspect of multi-level division of power and work. What we are interested in are the concealed, hybrid and complete forms of privatisation, and the conditions in which individual forms of privatisation achieve a (sub)optimal state. We study conflicts and cooperation between the public and private sectors, and the regulatory role of so-called quasi-markets in privatisation processes. The evaluation of higher education has been expanded to include the evaluation of public services in all areas of social services. Here we examine various forms of internal, external, a priori and a posteriori evaluation, regardless of whether they are based on self-evaluation, evaluation by colleagues or other methods of evaluating programmes and policies. The developmental gap between the public and private sector is particularly obvious in the developed industrial societies. To overcome this, the so-called New Public Management approach has been intensively applied for the last two decades. Its aim is to ensure greater efficiency and success of the public sector by selectively transferring regulatory methods and techniques from the private sector. Apart from quality management, privatisation and evaluation are the most common instruments used in modernisation of the public sector.
Most important scientific results Final report
Most important socioeconomically and culturally relevant results Final report
Views history
Favourite