Projects / Programmes source: ARIS

Bibliometrijske metode ocenjevanja raziskovalnih rezultatov in njihova uporaba v medicinskih vedah (Slovene)

Research activity

Code Science Field Subfield
3.08.00  Medical sciences  Public health (occupational safety)   

Code Science Field
3.05  Medical and Health Sciences  Other medical sciences 
Evaluation (rules)
source: COBISS
Researchers (15)
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  24866  Samo Belavič Pučnik  Public health (occupational safety)  Researcher  2011 - 2012  88 
2.  30722  PhD Rok Blagus  Systems and cybernetics  Researcher  2012  195 
3.  20134  PhD Mojca Čižek Sajko  Human reproduction  Researcher  2011 - 2012  106 
4.  04041  PhD Jurček Dimec  Computer science and informatics  Researcher  2009  101 
5.  22621  PhD Polonca Ferk  Metabolic and hormonal disorders  Researcher  2010  141 
6.  30505  PhD Michael Galsworthy  Computer science and informatics  Researcher  2009 - 2010  14 
7.  11373  PhD Dimitar Hristovski  Computer science and informatics  Researcher  2009  145 
8.  07705  PhD Emil Hudomalj  Public health (occupational safety)  Researcher  2009 - 2012  39 
9.  06594  PhD Primož Južnič  Information science and librarianship  Researcher  2009 - 2012  548 
10.  29100  Maja Kunstelj    Technical associate  2009 - 2012 
11.  15355  PhD Branimir Leskošek  Public health (occupational safety)  Researcher  2009 - 2012  181 
12.  30409  PhD Stojan Pečlin  Information science and librarianship  Researcher  2009 - 2012  18 
13.  03410  PhD Drago Rudel  Medical sciences  Researcher  2009 - 2010  193 
14.  08992  PhD Janez Stare  Public health (occupational safety)  Head  2009 - 2012  277 
15.  32581  PhD Minja Zorc  Computer science and informatics  Researcher  2010 - 2011  180 
Organisations (1)
no. Code Research organisation City Registration number No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  0381  University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine  Ljubljana  1627066  46,179 
Significance for science
Tesearch in bibliometrics is presently oriented towards understanding of what we are measuring via citations analysis and the project was well in line with this trend. Understanding the indicators which supposedly measure the quality of basic research is of course crucial. The published research results are the main source for evaluating the quality of research, and are used in habilitation processes and in alocating money for research. This is not and should not be a simple count of articles or citations. Also, some findings maybe be valid for certain countries, but the opposite may be true for others. In this project we proposed an entirely new, statistically sound, measure for comparison of research groups (teams, universities, countries ...), and we checked certain findings by studying the Slovenian situation.
Significance for the country
This was a project where we wanted to check out some of the basic hypothesis in bibliometrics, it can be said that the results also are important for Slovenia, particularly for the existing system of research results evaluation. Citations of research papers and other publication are certainly complicated phenomena, esepecilally whent they are used for assesmnet purposes. This is due to a variety of elements: visibility, impact, influence, and excellence. All of our research results, even if they have a broader meaning, are based on data from research groups in Slovenia. So the analysis of these data has the concrete meaning for research evaluation and assesment.
Most important scientific results Annual report 2009, 2010, final report, complete report on dLib.si
Most important socioeconomically and culturally relevant results Annual report 2009, 2010 complete report on dLib.si
Views history