Loading...
Projects / Programmes source: ARIS

Ocenjevanje kakovosti v ginekologiji in porodništvu (Slovene)

Research activity

Code Science Field Subfield
3.05.00  Medical sciences  Human reproduction   

Code Science Field
3.05  Medical and Health Sciences  Other medical sciences 
Evaluation (rules)
source: COBISS
Researchers (14)
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  06970  PhD Borut Kobal  Human reproduction  Researcher  2009 - 2012  420 
2.  22303  PhD Sara Korošec  Human reproduction  Researcher  2009 - 2010  138 
3.  17638  Meta Kovačič Lužnik    Technical associate  2009 - 2012 
4.  06171  PhD Adolf Lukanovič  Human reproduction  Researcher  2009 - 2012  781 
5.  13515  PhD Leon Meglič  Human reproduction  Researcher  2009 - 2012  151 
6.  04216  PhD Živa Novak-Antolič  Human reproduction  Researcher  2009 - 2012  418 
7.  02750  PhD Marjan Pajntar  Human reproduction  Researcher  2009 - 2012  331 
8.  22159  Martina Pečlin    Technical associate  2009 - 2012 
9.  14534  Mojca Pirc  Human reproduction  Researcher  2009 - 2012  23 
10.  21362  PhD Špela Smrkolj  Human reproduction  Researcher  2009 - 2012  304 
11.  34387  Dajana Sterlekar Remec    Technical associate  2012 
12.  34386  Darija Škerl    Technical associate  2012 
13.  05015  PhD Ivan Verdenik  Human reproduction  Head  2009 - 2012  480 
14.  12177  PhD Eda Vrtačnik-Bokal  Human reproduction  Researcher  2009 - 2012  597 
Organisations (1)
no. Code Research organisation City Registration number No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  0312  University Medical Centre Ljubljana  Ljubljana  5057272000  77,764 
Significance for science
Every organization tends to think that the quality of its work is at least as good as that of others, if not the best. Comparison between organizations (and individuals) are usually based on the subjective impressions. Quality of work is a result of his education, work conditions, experience, and observation of co-workers. Over the years, it can happen that the quality of a work falls seamlessly but due to the slow gradual process, nobody notices. Therefore, over time could arise large differences between institutions which are not explainable with simple arguments but we need a scientific approach.With the present project we identified institutions whose quality indicators deviate from the average more than one would expect from a random distribution. With the help of mathematical statistical principles, we are trying to identify the causes of it.
Significance for the country
Improved quality of professional clinical work means less complications, shorter hospital stay and sick leave, better satisfaction of the patients. All combined also brings lower cost.
Most important scientific results Annual report 2009, 2010, 2011, final report, complete report on dLib.si
Most important socioeconomically and culturally relevant results Annual report 2009, 2010, 2011, final report, complete report on dLib.si
Views history
Favourite