Filters
cris logo
-
New search Filters
Select from list
Displayed from Show more
You have reached the maximum number of displayed search results.
All results displayed
No results are available for the search performed
Displayed from
You have reached the maximum number of displayed search results.
All results displayed
Loading results
Obtaining statistical data

Projects / Programmes source: ARIS

Recenzentsko ocenjevanje, kvantitativni kazalniki in uporaba informacijskih orodij za evalvacijo znanstveno-raziskovalnih aktivnosti (Slovene)

Edit
Research activity

Code Science Field Subfield
5.13.00  Social sciences  Information science and librarianship   

Code Science Field
5.09  Social Sciences  Other social sciences 
Evaluation (rules)
source: COBISS
Evaluation of bibliographic research performance indicators according to ARIS methodology
Citations Citations for bibliographic records in COBIB.SI that are linked to records in citation databases
source: WoS source: Scopus source: COBISS
Researchers (7)
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publications
1.  08784  PhD Tomaž Bartol  Information science and librarianship  Researcher  2010 - 2012  279 
2.  33373  Doris Dekleva Smrekar  Information science and librarianship  Researcher  2010 - 2013  48 
3.  06594  PhD Primož Južnič  Information science and librarianship  Head  2010 - 2013  548 
4.  30410  Tilen Mandelj  Information science and librarianship  Researcher  2010 - 2013  19 
5.  30411  Miro Pušnik  Information science and librarianship  Researcher  2010 - 2013  107 
6.  33119  Barbara Rugelj  Human reproduction  Technical associate  2010 - 2013  0 
7.  19614  PhD Polona Vilar  Information science and librarianship  Researcher  2010 - 2013  288 
Significance for science
The funding system for science is viewed as an important investment in the future. A well-functioning system has to find a balance between largely contrasting requirements: it has to allow some steering of the research system towards broader policy goals versus leaving a sufficient degree of autonomy to scientists and research groups. It must also stimulate by allocating funds to the hitherto best scientists/researchers, yet keep places open for new researchers and new research ideas to emerge. Modern science policy-makers in governments have shifted away from absolutely worshiping science/academic autonomy to an interactive and dynamic – and far more managed – relationship between scientists, government and society. From the outset of this process, questions have been raised about the implications of different aspects of science policy. Slovenia has a centralised and unified system of researchers’ bibliographies, which form part of the Co-operative Online Bibliographic System and Services (COBISS). Research activities need to be governed by transparency, especially when the research is funded from public resources. Slovenia may be a small country (two million inhabitants) but it possesses a vigorous research community. Academics and researchers alike are subjected to rigorous criteria in the academic tenure systems as well as in the calls for research proposals, with the final aim of improving Slovenia's competitive capacity in the globalized world. The system of evaluation, has been consistently used over two decades which permits the analysis of data on a long-term basis. This system also allows research that is interesting worldwide and also appear in prestigous international journals.
Significance for the country
The results are especially important for monitoring research policy in Slovenia and improving the existing expert system.
Most important scientific results Final report, complete report on dLib.si
Most important socioeconomically and culturally relevant results Final report, complete report on dLib.si
Confirmation required
Views history
Favourite