Loading...
Projects / Programmes source: ARIS

Unsteady skin friction modelling in hydraulic piping systems

Research activity

Code Science Field Subfield
2.13.07  Engineering sciences and technologies  Process engineering  Water power 

Code Science Field
T140  Technological sciences  Energy research 

Code Science Field
2.03  Engineering and Technology  Mechanical engineering 
Keywords
hydraulic piping systems, transients, unsteady flow, skin friction, dissipation
Evaluation (rules)
source: COBISS
Researchers (8)
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  03923  PhD Anton Bergant  Process engineering  Head  2013 - 2016  392 
2.  05912  PhD Andrej Bombač  Process engineering  Researcher  2015  222 
3.  36852  Matic Cotič    Technical associate  2015  23 
4.  32071  PhD Jurij Gregorc  Materials science and technology  Researcher  2013 - 2016  89 
5.  36237  Rok Mavrič  Process engineering  Researcher  2015 - 2016  10 
6.  31779  Jernej Mazij  Process engineering  Researcher  2013 - 2016  38 
7.  16218  Marko Pečar  Process engineering  Researcher  2014 - 2016 
8.  03544  PhD Iztok Žun  Process engineering  Researcher  2013 - 2016  540 
Organisations (2)
no. Code Research organisation City Registration number No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  0782  University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering  Ljubljana  1627031  29,205 
2.  2836  Litostroj Power, a company for design, power plant engineering and manufacture of power generation and industrial equipment Ltd.  Ljubljana  2172836  473 
Abstract
Skin friction and consequential damping in unsteady flows can significantly reduce harmful effects of large pressure transients in hydraulic piping systems and thus increases safe operation. Pipeline monitoring systems such as inverse transient analysis for leak detection (environmental impact) and pipe roughness calibration (energy losses) require accurate modelling of transients for longer simulation periods, which in many situations requires improved modelling of unsteady skin frictional behaviour. Unsteady skin friction arises from the extra losses caused by the two-dimensional nature of the unsteady velocity profile. Skin friction properties will be investigated for a number of flow types including accelerating, decelerating and oscillatory flow cases. The main objective of the research is to develop and valiadate unsteady skin friction models for investigated basic unsteady flow types and transient event types in liquid-filled pipelines. Two unsteady skin friction models will be investigated and further developed, namely the instantaneous acceleration-based model and the convolution-based model. The developed models will be implemented into a method of characteristics transient code. The developed models will be validated against experimental data from a small- and large-diameter pipeline apparatuses. Experimental data for validation study have been acquired by principal investigator during his collaborative experimental reserach work in Adelaide and Delft test facilities.
Significance for science
- better understanding of flow physics in hydraulic piping systems during transient events with particular emphasis on skin friction properties - development of novel unsteady skin friction models in pipes - research results could be applicable to other scientific fields including mathematics & physics (acoustic flow) and medicine (blood flow in arteries)
Significance for the country
- application of novel unsteady skin friction models enables optimal dimensions of piping systems, safer operation of systems and reliable on-line monitoring (on-line leakage detection) - lower weight of piping systems (optimisation of devices) yield lower material costs, lower energy consumption for manufacturing and lower operational costs - industrial growth (improved knowledge in the field of pipeline design and operation) - new jobs (continuation of long tradition of design and manufacturing of industrial piping systems) - protection of environment (advanced design and application of renewable energy systems and natural resource systems)
Most important scientific results Annual report 2013, 2014, 2015, final report
Most important socioeconomically and culturally relevant results Annual report 2013, 2014, 2015, final report
Views history
Favourite