Filtri
cris logo
-
Novo iskanje Filtri
Izberi iz seznama
Prikazano od Prikaži več
Dosegli ste najvišje možno število prikazanih rezultatov iskanja.
Prikazani so vsi rezultati
Za izvedeno iskanje ni na voljo rezultatov
Prikazano od
Dosegli ste najvišje možno število prikazanih rezultatov iskanja.
Prikazani so vsi rezultati
Nalaganje rezultatov
Pridobivanje statističnih podatkov

Mednarodni projekti vir: SICRIS

New Frontiers of Peer Review (PEERE)

Uredi
Raziskovalci (4)
št. Evidenčna št. Ime in priimek Razisk. področje Vloga Obdobje Štev. publikacij
1.  01467  dr. Vladimir Batagelj  Matematika  Raziskovalec  2014 - 2018  977 
2.  02465  dr. Anuška Ferligoj  Sociologija  Raziskovalec  2014 - 2018  795 
3.  28074  dr. Luka Kronegger  Sociologija  Raziskovalec  2014 - 2018  140 
4.  02943  dr. Franc Mali  Sociologija  Raziskovalec  2014 - 2018  462 
Organizacije (2)
št. Evidenčna št. Razisk. organizacija Kraj Matična številka Štev. publikacij
1.  0582  Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za družbene vede  Ljubljana  1626957  40.443 
2.  1554  Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za matematiko in fiziko  Ljubljana  1627007  34.117 
Povzetek
Peer review is a cornerstone of science, whose quality and efficiency depends on a complex, large-scale collaboration process, which is sensitive to motivations, incentives and institutional contexts. Recent proofs of the failures of peer review, due to judgment bias and parochialism and cases of misconduct, have contributed to calls for a reconsideration of the rigour and quality of the process. This Action aims to improve efficiency, transparency and accountability of peer review through a trans-disciplinary, cross-sectorial collaboration. The objectives of this Action are: (i) to analyse peer review in different scientific areas by integrating quantitative and qualitative research and incorporating recent experimental and computational findings; (ii) to evaluate implications of different models of peer review and to explore new incentive structures, rules and measures to improve collaboration in all stages of the peer review process; (iii) to involve science stakeholders in data sharing and testing initiatives, (iv) to define collaboratively a joint research agenda that points to an evidence-based peer review reform. Not only can a better peer review system improve the self- regulation processes of science to benefit all science stakeholders, it can also increase the social recognition and credibility of science in Europe.
Zahtevana je potrditev
Zgodovina ogledov
Priljubljeno