Projects / Programmes
Arbitration Law Reform in Slovenia
Code |
Science |
Field |
Subfield |
5.05.00 |
Social sciences |
Law |
|
Code |
Science |
Field |
S110 |
Social sciences |
Juridical sciences |
S130 |
Social sciences |
Civil law: persons, family, marriage contract, successions, gifts, property, obligations, guarantees |
S144 |
Social sciences |
Industrial and commercial law |
Law, Arbitration, Unictral Model Law
Researchers (6)
no. |
Code |
Name and surname |
Research area |
Role |
Period |
No. of publicationsNo. of publications |
1. |
25611 |
PhD Matija Damjan |
Social sciences |
Junior researcher |
2006 - 2007 |
297 |
2. |
13029 |
PhD Aleš Galič |
Law |
Researcher |
2004 |
761 |
3. |
20427 |
PhD Špelca Mežnar |
Law |
Researcher |
2004 - 2006 |
206 |
4. |
27793 |
Saša Šest |
|
Technical associate |
2006 - 2007 |
0 |
5. |
03096 |
PhD Lojze Ude |
Law |
Head |
2004 - 2007 |
531 |
6. |
24285 |
PhD Ana Vlahek |
Social sciences |
Junior researcher |
2004 - 2006 |
405 |
Organisations (1)
Abstract
In recent decades, the number of international commercial disputes brought before arbitration tribunals has increased significantly, especially when compared to ordinary court proceedings. To secure this possibility, parties are encouraged to include an arbitration clause in their contracts. Parties are free to determine the competence of either institutional or ad hoc arbitration. A number of reasons can be put forward in favour of arbitration proceedings: efficient and speedy procedure, flexibility, free choice of arbitrators, party"s influence on the rules of procedure, choice of law, limited reasons to set aside the award, enforceability of arbitral award.
Currently, rules on arbitration law in Slovenia are incorporated in two major acts: Civil Procedure Code (for rules on domestic arbitrations) and Private International Law and Procedure Act (enforcement and recognition of foreign arbitral awards), both strongly relying on the solutions adopted in old Yugoslav Acts.
In practice, only a few arbitral awards are issued in Slovenia every year. This is partly due to economic and other reasons (such as lack of knowledge, scepticism, relatively high costs). A share of responsibility for this situation should however also be contributed to insufficient and obsolete rules on arbitration and systemic unconformity of the legislation in force. With Slovenia"s membership in EU the problem might intensify as it is expected that foreign trade (therefore volume of contracts) will increase.
The aim of the research is to prepare an expertise on the possible reform of arbitration law in Slovenia. The reform shall be pointed at improving the existing legislation by adopting modern, internationally accepted solutions (New York Convention, UNCITRAL Model Law). To achieve this goal, we shall commence with a critical analysis of existing legislation and caselaw, followed by the report on some particularly useful recent foreign experiences (Croatia, Germany, Austria, Hungary). In the final stage we shall be able to recommend the measures (possibly new Law on arbitration) to improve the current situation.
The most important issues of the reform will include (inter alia): the adoption of UNCITRAL Model Law, arbitrability, setting aside procedure, enforcement and recognition and provisional measures.