Loading...
Projects / Programmes source: ARIS

klimatske spremembe in njihov vpliv na prevladujočo paradigmo v ekonomskih in poslovnih znanostih ter v Sloveniji (Slovene)

Periods
Research activity

Code Science Field Subfield
5.02.00  Social sciences  Economics   

Code Science Field
5.02  Social Sciences  Economics and Business 
Evaluation (rules)
source: COBISS
Researchers (27)
no. Code Name and surname Research area Role Period No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  24795  PhD Domen Bajde  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  187 
2.  18305  PhD Andreja Cirman  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  556 
3.  24101  PhD Barbara Čater  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  348 
4.  19761  PhD Tomaž Čater  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  433 
5.  36386  Maja Dolinar  Sociology  Junior researcher  2013  62 
6.  18940  PhD Polona Domadenik Muren  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  467 
7.  30715  PhD Daša Farčnik  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  156 
8.  18307  PhD Aljoša Feldin  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2011  83 
9.  20064  PhD Aleksandra Gregorič  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2011  188 
10.  08741  PhD Marko Hočevar  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2011  1,952 
11.  33181  PhD Maja Hosta  Economics  Junior researcher  2010 - 2013  13 
12.  10414  PhD Marko Jaklič  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2011  773 
13.  26020  PhD Ljubica Knežević Cvelbar  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  323 
14.  18441  PhD Matjaž Koman  Economics  Researcher  2010 - 2013  226 
15.  33662  MSc Gordana Lalović  Economics  Technical associate  2012  11 
16.  36389  Ana Oblak  Law  Junior researcher  2013  28 
17.  16157  PhD Irena Ograjenšek  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  660 
18.  19248  PhD Marko Pahor  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  538 
19.  02413  PhD Janez Prašnikar  Economics  Head  2009 - 2013  766 
20.  33182  PhD Kaja Primc  Economics  Junior researcher  2010 - 2013  91 
21.  23031  PhD Tjaša Redek  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  769 
22.  18980  PhD Adriana Rejc Buhovac  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  508 
23.  30717  PhD Domen Trobec  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  50 
24.  11462  PhD Irena Vida  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  657 
25.  32067  PhD Damjan Voje  Economics  Junior researcher  2009 - 2012  27 
26.  13681  PhD Nada Zupan  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  1,118 
27.  15495  PhD Vesna Žabkar  Economics  Researcher  2009 - 2013  922 
Organisations (1)
no. Code Research organisation City Registration number No. of publicationsNo. of publications
1.  0584  University of Ljubljana, School of Economics and Business (SEB)  Ljubljana  1626922  42,896 
Significance for science
Research focus on the firms’ behaviour allows us to: 1. analyse the development and competitiveness of firms through prism of internal/external factors (ownership, indebtedness, institutional characteristics, structural reforms and transition); 2. comparatively analyse indebtedness and capital structure at the EU level which is the first such analysis of its kind and should help us to explain situation in Slovenia along with differences among firms, sectors, and countries; 3. reveal the comparative efficiency of the anti-crisis measures in EU and effects of institutional characteristics of countries; 4. reveal the importance of internal characteristics, restructuring, investment in tangible/intangible capital and relations in firms. These results are important from the competitiveness and future development perspective; 5. contribution to the development of economic theory and empirical research in the areas of the role of stakeholders in firms; 6. emphasise extreme relevance and importance of strategic firms’ behaviour in current applied economic science due to its international aspects. Consumer analysis in tourism and quality of life from the perspective of sustainable development: 7. we contributed to integration of several levels of responsible consumption (environmental, social), observed predecessors of individual behaviour and enabled insight into importance of each dimension to develop strategies and impact on consumer behaviour; 8. based on the literature review and consistent use of two dimensions of firms’ responsibility we contributed to a more coherent understanding of ethical, sustainable, environmentally and socially responsible consumption; 9. position of the research into transitional environment expands the context beyond the traditional studied western cultural backgrounds; 10. we were first to deal with the problem of indebtedness of Slovenian firms and society from the perspective of sustainable development, in context of aging, pension reform and intergenerational relations; 11. analysed specific characteristics of Slovenian towns and their residents in light of sustainable urban development, which is one of only a few such analyses in Slovenia, and the first based on the economics of happiness. Research approaches used in the analysis are either new or applied in Slovenia for the first time: 12. development of methodology for measurement of intangible capital in the public sector; 13. preparation of database for intangible capital assessment using data provided by the SORS; 14. development of methodology for measurement of individual’s satisfaction with the quality of life in Slovenian cities with special focus on sustainable element; 15. use of annual reports at EU level, allowing for accurate comparative analysis of firms in the EU and Slovenia; 16. preparation of the first database of intangible capital in all sectors for a developing country, which allows private/public comparison and analysis of the implications for productivity.
Significance for the country
1. better understanding of Slovenian companies’ characteristics provided insights for businesses/ national economy on the adequacy of existing practices and proposed relevant changes. 2. comparative international analysis contributed to the understanding of Slovenian firms’ competitiveness. 3. study of the ownership problem, its transformation and (types of) investments and productivity is important for policy implication and guidance for management and owners. 4. based on identified problems we prepared gudilines for policy measures targeted at an increase in efficiency and competitiveness. 5. analysis of intangible capital in public sector revealed its weaknesses and contributed to increased investments in intangible capital, their efficiency, reduction of the public sector and stabilization of public finances. Through the study of sustainable development we: 6. continued the work in the field of environmental and sustainable elements and intangible capital since the literature and evidence on this topic for developing and transition countries is still quite limited and it is important to continue the work. 7. defined the importance of tourism for regional development, contributed to the development of appropriate measures and activities to maintain the countryside and development of eco-agriculture. 8. analysis of aging and its effects on sustainable development with respect to intergenerational relations contributed to the pensions funding analysis. 9. identifed sustainable impulses of residents and their satisfaction with life in cities, which is important input for design of appropriate measures and enhancing life quality. 10. provided insights into consumer behaviour and decision making with respect to environmentally and socially responsible corporate strategies. Other effects: 11. results are available to researchers, businesses, public institutions, governments, students and other interested public for different purposes; we presented them also at the Portorož Business Conference, which contributes to the problem awareness among businessmen. 12. many aspects of the analysis are novelty in the field, especially for developing countries, which allows for greater recognition of researchers and Faculty of Economics; integrative collaboration with prominent researchers, and improved quality of future research outputs. 13. due to wide research group international collaboration is strengthened. 14. results are not only communicated through scientific but also professional channels and serve as a platform for fundamental decisions in Slovenian economic development and development of Slovenian companies; the results are also disseminated via mass media. 15. results may positively affect Slovenian economic climate and growth; they may trigger necessary reforms of business environment and changes in the behaviour of key decision-makers.
Most important scientific results Annual report 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, final report, complete report on dLib.si
Most important socioeconomically and culturally relevant results Annual report 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, final report, complete report on dLib.si
Views history
Favourite